LuxuryActivist

LuxuryActivist is an international lifestyle webzine based in Switzerland. Get fresh news about luxury, arts, fashion, beauty, travel, high-tech and more. subscribe to our Happy friday luxury newsletter or follow us in social media.
Advertismentspot_img

The Syrian Military Just Did Something

The Syrian regime was the only government in the world to lay new landmines this year, campaigners said Thursday as they issued an annual report on the use and effect of the devastating weapons.

Mark Hiznay, the editor of the report for the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL), said the finding is a significant change from last year, when four governments laid mines, and represents the lowest number since the Ottawa Mine Ban Treaty was signed in 1997.

"This represents a milestone for us: having only one country using antipersonnel mines," he told reporters in Geneva at the unveiling of the 2012 Landmine Monitor report.

But even though only one government laid the lethal mines this year, the explosives were still used by non-state armed groups in six countries — Afghanistan, Colombia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Thailand and Yemen — up from four countries last year, the report said.

The ICBL's report hailed record high levels of funding for mine clearance and a dramatic reduction in the number of people killed by the explosive devices over the past decade.

These developments are "a testament to the achievements of the Mine Ban Treaty over the past 15 years and that's the good news," said Hiznay, who is also a senior arms researcher for Human Rights Watch.

Syria was also among the four countries singled out in last year's report, when the governments of Israel, Libya and Myanmar were found to have used landmines.

In Syria, at least 19 people were killed by the explosive devices in border-crossing areas during the first five months of the year, including a Landmine Monitor source who died while crossing a mine field in March, according to ICBL.

There had also been an incident in October, when Syrian troops abandoning a military position near the village of Khirbet al-Jouz close to the Turkish border had left behind up to 200 landmines, Hiznay said.

"Eventually, the villagers began finding them the hard way," he said.

The Syrian regime appeared to be using old stockpiles of the weapons produced by the Soviet Union in the 1980s, he said, adding that "there was "no indication of recent supplies."

While the number of countries laying new landmines might be low, 59 countries and six other areas were confirmed to have been affected by the deadly explosives this year, and mines were suspected in another 12 countries, the report said.

The ICBL said 4,286 people were killed by landmines worldwide last year — or nearly 12 deaths a day, compared to 32 in 2001.

The steady decrease in annual casualty rates in some of the world's most mine-affected countries, like Afghanistan and Cambodia, had however been offset by a "significant increase" in mine-linked deaths in countries like Libya, Sudan and Syria.

In Syria, the number of casualties had jumped from nine in 2010 to 20 last year, the ICBL said.

The organisation, which won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1997 for its efforts to rid the world of landmines, said a growing number of governments were signing on to the treaty, which now counts 160 signatory states.

International and national funding for mine clearing activities meanwhile reached an all-time high last year of around $662 million (511 million euros), ICBL said, while noting that funding for helping landmine survivors had fallen sharply to just $30 million in 2011.

As for landmine production, only India, Myanmar, Pakistan and South Korea appeared to still be actively producing antipersonnel mines, the report showed.

However, another eight countries still reserve the right to produce such weapons: China, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Russia, Singapore, the United States and Vietnam.

The ICBL report came ahead of a five-day meeting in Geneva next week of signatory countries to the Ottawa Treaty.

The 15 Worst Housing Markets For The Next Five Years

Housing has turned the corner and is said to be a bright spot in the U.S. economy.

But national home prices are expected to climb just 3.3 percent in the next five years, according to the latest data from Fiserv Case-Shiller.

Earlier this week we put together a list of the 15 best housing markets for the next five years that will see home prices rise at a much faster pace.

Today, we're following it up with a feature on the 15 housing markets that are projected to see the most declines or the slowest growth in home prices.

Note: The median family income and home price data is for Q1 2012. Unemployment data is for May 2012, and population data is for 2011.

NY Fashion Week Roundup: Celebrities Like Kelly Osbourne At New York Fashion Week And Google Glasses At Diane von Furstenberg

Google arrives at New York Fashion Week! While they didn’t exactly put on a show, they did team up with fashion icon Diane von Furstenberg, who rose to the challenge of presenting their new Google glasses, which debuted on her runway. Google co-founder Sergey Brin joined DVF in her runway lap after the show. Futuristic fashion? We don’t think so… Google Glasses might be launched to the public sooner than anticipated. (LA Times)

Fashion Week this season is all about social media, with private publishers peaking and flourishing as they provide an inside look to all the runways. The public is using Instagram, Twitter and Tumblr, but surprisingly Facebook seems to stay behind in immediate media events. Here are six bloggers you should follow to get an inside view to New York Fashion Week. (Mashable)

Men’s fashion takes center stage at New York Fashion Week. While menswear may sometimes seem like an afterthought at these events, this season big efforts have been made. Details magazine set up a space at Lincoln Center Public Library to host menswear shows, and GQ opened a pop-up menswear shop with Nordstrom. (Wall Street Journal Blog)

An 81-year-old model walked down the runway of Norisol Ferrari’s Spring 2013 collection on Monday (10.9). Carmen Dell’Orefice is a retired model, who also appeared in HBO’s documentary “About Face: The Supermodels, Then and Now”. In a youth-driven industry, Dell’Orefice says she’s proof of the nation’s general acceptance of the graying population. (Today)

Celebrity sightings at NYFW! Take a look at some behind the scenes photos from the celebrities themselves. Photos from- Kim Kardashian, Pharrell Williams, Solange Knowles, Anna Wintour, Victoria Beckham, Ivanka Trump and more. (Pop Sugar)

Closing our list of fashion highlights for this week, here’s an interesting video from New York Magazine- recording shoes from random fashion lovers just outside of NYFW shows. Take a look at some great designs:

Fashion Roundup: Lady Gaga answers her critics and Sarah Jessica Parker the new editor of Vogue.com?

Victoria’s Secret Angel Candice Swanepoel suffers from a tragic Photoshop fail, featuring uneven boobs in a bra advertising campaign. The photo was meant to be used for the “Ad 2 Cups Multi-Way Bra” campaign, but generally people expect bras to do their magic on the entire chest and not just one side. (Refinery 29)

Kate Moss & George Michael will appear on the cover of Vogue Paris. The October issue will feature the two together, mimicking a red carpet shot, with Kate wearing a gorgeous Elie Saab red gown. Both Michael and Kate appeared in the closing ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics, and Moss has guest-starred in Michael’s new music video this summer. (Huffington Post)

Sarah Jessica Parker the new editor of Vogue.com? Not exactly--but she plays the part well in a Glee debut which has been released. According to reports, Anna Wintour worked closely on the wardrobe for the character, which will once again surely mark Parker as a world-famed fashionista. (Vogue UK)

Oscar Wilde once said, “No man is rich enough to buy back his past.” This is especially true for Victoria Beckham, a celebrity who sees her future at a totally different place than that of her past. Cheesy teen modeling shots have been revealed of the former Spice Girl star. (Styleite)

Lady Gaga answers her critics for putting on weight by starting a ‘Body Revolution’. The mega pop star has recently been faced with a public attack for her weight, which by looking at the new pictures is clearly not the case. Gaga posted on her site, Little Monsters, a revealing lingerie photoshoot of herself calling to inspire bravery. (Fashionista)

Closing our list of weekly highlights, take a look at this great new video from Nowness.com, featuring Chanel Iman pole dancing! A great short fashion video by husband-and-wife photographers Dusan Reljin and Hilde Pettersen Reljin.

Daniel Lopatin & Tim Hecker

The latest release from the Software Studios imprint is 'Instrumental Tourist', the collaborative LP of Brooklyn-based Oneohtrix Point Never and the Polaris Award-winning Tim Hecker, whose respective experiments have routinely teased at the boundaries of electronic music and the capacity for compositions to grow from decidedly non or anti-formalist beginnings. After being long-time fans of each others solo work, 'Instrumental Tourist' sees Hecker and Lopatin come together to not only explore the capacity for their music to find a common ground in a collaborative project and to push one another in the studio setting, but also to probe at the potential for ambient and drone music to delve deeper into new, unfamiliar sonic realms.

DazedDigital: What inspired you to work on a collaborative album together?

Oneohtrix Point Never:I approached Tim about collaborating with me for a series of 12"s that C. Spencer Yeh and I wanted to release on Software - bringing together electronic music producers working in a more or less improvisatory manner in the studio. The idea was partially inspired by my interest in Teo Macero and his sessions with Miles Davis' varying groups in the late '60s and early '70s. There is a dynamic between open ended jams and the logic of tape editing that I find really stimulating. I thought that Tim and I would be great in terms of both utilizing the studio as an instrument, but I also just had a hunch that we'd compliment each other well; like in a rhythm section, or the ways directors and DPs work together. Contrasting styles and struggles can often lead to fresh work and having admired Tim's solo stuff, I thought it was worth a shot.

Tim Hecker:I was deeply into Daniel's last recordReplicawhen he suggested the project. I thought it made sense on a bunch of levels. Instead of doing a collaboration which brings together the 'inert' digital composer with a 'lively' or 'physical' instrumentalist to spray fresh life on the mouse clicking tedium, I thought some other route was better and this project made sense. Anyways, the point of a collaborative effort shouldn't be visualizing a clear path in advance. I wasn't sure how it would work out, and was interested in how it might take shape - which was part of the pleasure.

DD: Your LPs are stylized regarding around "digital garbage", and the ambiguous evocations of drone and ambient music. How do you feel your respective aesthetics married on the LP?

Oneohtrix Point Never:I think we both do a fair amount of melodic manipulation. There are some procedural things we do with garbage that lead to sounds suggesting classical forms, and upon discovering some of the specifics oh how that works respectively, we were able to work out a shared language.

Tim Hecker:From way too high of a vantage point it could be argued that we occupy similar terrain of music, but I think we both agree there's significant variance in terms of our interests and approaches in composing sound. I honestly wasn't interested in 'marrying' our aesthetics in a kind of linear additive sense, but rather evaporating the self into a project that is more than just you.

DD: Did you begin the project with a particular conceptual direction in mind as a duo?

Oneohtrix Point Never:I'm not sure how it emerged, but we pretty quickly got into this idea that we could paint an extended portrait of a sonic world that is filled with stock musical motifs and sounds in there most vulnerable states. Like the subconscious fears and desires of azither- what might that look like? There was a lot of conversation like that. But what you're hearing are very loose portrayals of that idea. It's more an anchor to stimulate, but then we really do end up just jamming off of each other in a way that isn't conceptually didactic.

Tim Hecker:We didn't cut a path in advance. It sort of took shape very quickly in a non-contrived, almost unconscious level through joking around and talking in the studio. It may not seem apparent from the music but our studio time was filled with laughs and rapid-fire banter that kind of helped to morph the approach as things continued over a couple of days.

DD: Technically, how did you approach the recording process? You're both known to process samples of acoustic instruments and analogue synths in your productions, so how did you work out enough of a variation between the two of you to feel you had technically distinct inputs into the sound of the project?

Tim Hecker:I didn't care for delineating any sort of distinct input. I enjoy dissolving myself into an ether of Daniel's solo lines. For example, mixing or adding reverb to one of Daniel's phrases for me constitutes creative input that is better than being sonically represented in an obvious way. I'm still obsessed with the effect of electronic instruments being re-amplified in real space and capturing those environments. We used a lot of room microphones that gave a greater depth to things.

DD: The album is presented as largely improvisational, with a sort of free-jazz spirit to it. How do you feel you worked towards more structured elements over a prolonged period of time with this ethos in mind?

Oneohtrix Point Never:It's less about free-jazz and more about an open, improvisatory approach and deep listening. You can easily link that to all sorts of 20th century musical practices. There's no need to compromise because there's no hardcore parameters set until we're dealing with edits or having some macro level discussion about which tunes work and which don't. There's formal aspects to both of our styles but I wouldn't say there is a formal aspect to this project. We usually agree on what sounds good, and when we don't its easy - we just ice it and move forward.

the–miumiu–london

"Let's begin at the beginning: I love Miuccia Prada.

I'd bend backwards/sideways/every way for her. I feel her. I love her observation, sensitivity, modernism; she's progressive with respect, taking it all in, playing with it. With humour, intelligence. She's my goal.

When I was invited to DJ as part of the-miumiu-london I was beyond myself. The event took over the Cafe Royal's beautiful and baroque surroundings for three days – I'd previously hung in a 40s club run there.

Across three floors there was The Club Lounge and Terrace, Conversation Room, Oyster Bar, The Restaurant, Cocktail Bar and Miu Miu shop/gallery.Nourishing the senses (and the mind) across architecture, food, aesthetics, conversation and sound, I like the fact that #themiumiu was a women's club, where men had to accompany as a guest – a clever reversal of archetype.But I wouldn't consciously call myself a feminist, I'm for equal rights, which was one of the themes in the Conversation Room I visited.

There were women from all walks of life with the odd male here and there. Discussion was of women role models, with Penny Martin and Shala Monroque leading. I'd have liked some more time to get real dirty with it, into the nitty gritty of deeper issues and diversity butI got my word in expressing my respect for Pina Bausch, inspired by her expression through various media as a pioneer for the invisible. The movement drawing on feelings and observation; the beauty and grace of the old age or a child, man or woman and all in-between. The joy, pain and delicacy of life all wrapped in a very beautiful uniform.

Afterwards, a friend and I took fancy to some simple pleasures, eating seafood in the surroundings of golden wall swirls and candlelight, and diving into champagne. The Miu Miu collection in the shop I knew off by heart, and I knew it'd speak to me.

Cleansed by the freshness of the sea fruit and taste of fine wine, I was ready to play. No rules, just musical passion for 3 hours. Stephen Jones came up to me saying 'I Only Have Eyes For You' was his favourite song ever. I think if Miuccia was there, she'd have had a dance.

I had a great evening and connected with my girlfriend. The eyes said it all: I want to go there again. But... all things must pass."

Visit Pandora's Jukeboxonline, Twitterand follow on Facebook

AD OF THE DAY: Photographers Almost Kill Themselves Just To Get That Shot

Camera commercials tend to all follow the same story: show how easy it is to use a camera and how well the pictures turn out. Canon's latest commercial does something different — it shows how hard taking a really good picture can be.

The spot, created by Grey, shows the work that amateur and professional photographers alike put into getting the perfect shot, such as a woman running in front of a giraffe to get an up-close image of the animal's face, and a man rolling downhill on a skateboard to get footage of a burning tire that's racing down the street next to him.

The background music of the commercial, "Beautiful Dreamer" by Rachel Fannan, could not be more perfect. Check out the commercial for the Canon Rebel T4i here:

YES, IT’S A CRISIS: 1,000 Jobs Gone At Groupon And LivingSocial; Can The Daily Deal Sector Turn It Around? (GRPN)

Daily deals title image lifehacker

via Lifehacker

The daily deal world is in turmoil.

LivingSocial just announced the firing of 400 employees, which is about 8.9% of its total workforce.

What's more unnerving is that over the past six months, Groupon reduced its workforce by 648 positions.

More than 1,000 reductions across both businesses is a huge deal. Those reductions aren't all layoffs; some are through attrition.

To cap it all, Groupon CEO Andrew Mason's job was in question all week, and he only received his board of directors' seal of approval late Thursday.

If this was happening at Facebook or Twitter — or any other major tech brand — people would be freaking out.

So why isn't anyone freaking out yet?

Arguably, this is a recession in the daily deal business.

It's the industry's first, given that it didn't exist until about four years ago.

LivingSocial told Business Insider via email about the job cuts. "After two years of hyper-growth from 450 to more than 4500 employees, these moves will align our cost structure against our 2013 plans and will help us set the company on a path for long-term growth and profitability. Specifically, they will allow us to invest more in critical priorities like marketing, mobile, and the hiring of additional technology staff."

LivingSocial told CNNMoney that it is moving much of its customer service from its headquarters in D.C. to Tuscon, "so some job openings will be available in that area." Sales and editorial, however, have simply been "streamlined."

The job losses reflect the shaky economic underpinnings of the daily deal business, which Groupon and LivingSocial have yet to wrestle into control.

LivingSocial posted a net loss of $566 million in Q3 2012. $496 million of LivingSocial's loss stems from a huge writedown of some of its acquisitions from 2011, the Washington Business Journal reports. LivingSocial's revenue also fell to $124 million in the three-month period, down from $138 million in the second quarter.

As of market close today, Groupon's stock price is currently sitting at $4.54, according to Yahoo Finance. The 52-week range is shocking: it reached a high of $25.84. That followed six months' of shrinking total billings at the company. (Its American business is robust; the international arm less so.)

A Groupon spokesperson tells us that its layoffs were largely due to new technology the company invested in that made those jobs irrelevant. In fact, we're told, Groupon has 200 job vacancies open across North America right now.

And, of course, the job cuts don't mean that Groupon and LivingSocial are going to vanish tomorrow. They're huge businesses after all. But they are cause for concern as they illuminate potential weaknesses in the daily deal business model.

The main problem is operational scale.

Both companies are dependent on large salesforces. It is very difficult for them to leverage operation scale: To sell more, they need to employ more people. Groupon historically has prided itself on the long-term relationships its salesforce builds with its merchants. They have struggled to leverage self-serve, turnkey sales the way Facebook has.

In fact, Groupon and LivingSocial aren't even tech companies. Rather, they're email companies. Although email is here to stay for a long time, the tidal shift among consumers is away from email to instant messaging, social media messaging, and mobile phone messaging. They need to pivot into alternate methods.

Groupon is trying just that, with Groupon Goods, which so far has been a success. And both companies need to do what Groupon says it is trying to do, which is replace human-to-human selling with tech that can increase each individual worker's selling power.

Lastly, the downturn ask whether the daily deal business has hit one of its natural ceilings: new merchants. Both companies need a fresh supply of new merchants to offer more deals, or to re-up on repeated deals. It's an open question that both Groupon and LivingSocial now have to prove: Is there enough new merchants or incremental repeat business from merchants for the sector to continue to grow?

A thousand-plus layoffs suggest that, for now, the question lacks a satisfying answer.

LuxuryActivist

LuxuryActivist is an international lifestyle webzine based in Switzerland. Get fresh news about luxury, arts, fashion, beauty, travel, high-tech and more. subscribe to our Happy friday luxury newsletter or follow us in social media.
Advertismentspot_img